From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouser v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 13, 2007
No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P.

November 13, 2007


ORDER


On October 16, 2007, the court issued an amended pretrial order stating that plaintiff's second amended pretrial statement listed no exhibits.

On October 25, 2007, plaintiff filed objections to the pretrial order. Plaintiff states that he filed a supplemental pretrial statement listing his exhibits. On October 15, 2007, plaintiff filed a pleading titled "supplement to pretrial evidence." In ths pleading, plaintiff requests that he be allowed to introduce a "magical novel" as evidence. Good cause appearing, the pretrial order is amended to reflect this novel as plaintiff's one item of evidence.

In the October 15, 2007, pleading, plaintiff also requests that he be allowed to call four additional witnesses: Jerry Garcia, Mary Feryance, S. Delany and C/O Anderson. Jerry Garcia is already listed in the amended pretrial order as one of plaintiff's witnesses. Good cause appearing, the court will amend the pretrial order to reflect Feryance, Delany and Anderson as additional witnesses for plaintiff.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the October 16, 2007, amended pretrial order is amended to reflect plaintiff's one item of evidence, i.e. the "magical novel," and plaintiff's three additional witnesses: Feryance, Delany and Anderson.


Summaries of

Rouser v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 13, 2007
No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2007)
Case details for

Rouser v. White

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ROUSER, Plaintiff, v. THEO WHITE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 13, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2007)