From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouser v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 14, 2007
No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P.

December 14, 2007


ORDER


On October 16, 2007, the court issued an amended pretrial order. On November 9, 2007, plaintiff filed a pleading titled "Additional Recent Evidence . . ." This pleading does not specifically identify any new evidence plaintiff proposes to offer at trial. Accordingly, this pleading is disregarded.

On November 21, 2007, plaintiff filed a pleading titled "Request for Additional Witnesses and Evidence . . ." Plaintiff requests that he be allowed to call Lieutenant Scott, Sergeant Huckabay, Chaplain Salaam, Correctional Officer Tucker, Bonnie Frakis, Inmate Hysell and Inmate Rodriguez regarding the consistent denial of religious services and the denial of food for these services.

While one of the issues to be addressed at trial is plaintiff's ability to practice group worship, plaintiff has not previously raised the issue of access to food during services. Rather, this issue has focused on plaintiff's ability to actually meet with other Wiccans for specific services. The court will not expand this issue to include access to religious food. In addition, inmate Hysell is housed at Mule Creek State Prison (MCSP). The issues regarding MCSP are not being litigated in this action. Accordingly, the request to call inmate Hysell as a witness is denied.

Plaintiff has not described the proposed testimony of any of the other proposed witnesses. Without knowing their proposed testimony, the court cannot evaluate plaintiff's request. Plaintiff is granted ten days from the date of this order to file a new motion describing the proposed testimony of the witnesses listed above, but for inmate Hysell.

Plaintiff also requests that the court provide him with tapes of the A Facility Yard for October 15, 2007, November 5, 2007, and November 15, 2007. Plaintiff argues that these tapes will show harassment of Wiccans. Discovery is closed and the court cannot order defendants to produce these tapes.

On December 3, 2007, plaintiff filed a pleading titled "New Evidence Which Occurred Nov 26, 2007." In this pleading, plaintiff alleges that he was verbally harassed. Plaintiff requests permission to call as witnesses the persons involved and with knowledge of the harassment. This request is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's November 9, 2007, notice of additional evidence is disregarded;

2. Plaintiff's November 21, 2007, and December 3, 2007, requests to call additional witnesses and add new evidence are denied;

3. Within ten days of the date of this order, plaintiff may file a new motion in support of his request to call witnesses concerning his recent denial of access to religious services.


Summaries of

Rouser v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 14, 2007
No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2007)
Case details for

Rouser v. White

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ROUSER, Plaintiff, v. THEO WHITE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 14, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2007)