From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouser v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 16, 2007
No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P.

November 16, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On October 16, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 16, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief filed September 26, 2007, is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Rouser v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 16, 2007
No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Rouser v. White

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ROUSER, Plaintiff, v. THEO WHITE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 16, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2007)