From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouser v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 17, 2008
No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P.

October 17, 2008


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By an order filed June 5, 2008, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant Deputy Director CDCR. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Deputy Director CDCR be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order.Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Rouser v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 17, 2008
No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Rouser v. Tilton

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ROUSER, Plaintiff, v. JAMES E. TILTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 17, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2008)