From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouser v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 12, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P.

March 12, 2007


ORDER


On February 16, 2007, plaintiff filed an "opposition" to the magistrate judge's order filed February 8, 2007, ordering plaintiff to file either an application to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The court construes plaintiff's opposition as a request for reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed February 8, 2007, is affirmed. Plaintiff shall file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee within twenty days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Rouser v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 12, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Rouser v. Tilton

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ROUSER, Plaintiff, v. JAMES E. TILTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 12, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2007)