From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouser v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 17, 2008
No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P.

January 17, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted.

Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). An initial partial filing fee of $28.59 will be assessed by this order. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the court will direct the appropriate agency to collect the initial partial filing fee from plaintiff's trust account and forward it to the Clerk of the Court. Thereafter, plaintiff will be obligated for monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to plaintiff's prison trust account. These payments will be forwarded by the appropriate agency to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in plaintiff's account exceeds $10.00, until the filing fee is paid in full. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

The complaint states a cognizable claim for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). If the allegations of the complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

2. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $28.59. All fees shall be collected and paid in accordance with this court's order to the Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed concurrently herewith.

3. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: Pliler, Rosario, Hill, Jackson, Carlson, Grant, Goldsmith, Johnson, Wiley, Hamad, Swope, Hannigan, Till, Campbell, Bunnell, Kanipe, Barham, Reyes, Espinoza, Stacy, Castro, Pogue, Director CDCR, Deputy Director CDCR, Schwarzenegger, Hickman, Stewart, Page.

4. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff 28 USM-285 forms, one summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed July 11, 2006.

5. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:

a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;
b. One completed summons;
c. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 3 above; and
d. Twenty-eight copies of the endorsed complaint filed July 11, 2006.

6. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs.

NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order filed ____________________:

_____ completed summons form _____ completed USM-285 forms _____ copies of the _______________ Complaint/Amended Complaint DATED: ____________________________________ Plaintiff


Summaries of

Rouser v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 17, 2008
No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Rouser v. Tilton

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ROUSER, Plaintiff, v. JAMES E. TILTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 17, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2008)