From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouser v. Gyles

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 26, 2023
2:21-cv-01396-KJM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01396-KJM-JDP (PC)

02-26-2023

WILLIAM ROUSER, Plaintiff, v. S. GYLES, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Good cause appearing, Defendants' ex parte application for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading is GRANTED. If Defendants' Motion for an Order Revoking Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status is denied, Defendants shall file a responsive pleading within thirty days of the Court's final order denying that motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rouser v. Gyles

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 26, 2023
2:21-cv-01396-KJM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Rouser v. Gyles

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ROUSER, Plaintiff, v. S. GYLES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 26, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-01396-KJM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2023)