From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouse v. Romero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 6, 2013
No. 11-cv-0405 JCH/SMV (D.N.M. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

No. 11-cv-0405 JCH/SMV

03-06-2013

XEZAKIA ROUSE, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY ROMERO, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR REVIEW OF NEW EVIDENCE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion for Review of Pertinent Evidence Newly Acquired in the Above Numbered Cause [Doc. 65] ("Motion"), filed on August 3, 2012. In his Motion, Petitioner offers documents that he believes "prove . . . his case." [Doc. 65] at 1. Respondent has filed no response, and none is needed. The Court will GRANT the motion.

At the time that Petitioner filed his Motion, the case was on appeal. The Tenth Circuit has since remanded the case to this Court on two claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. If the materials presented with the Motion are relevant to the two remaining issues, they will be appropriately considered.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Petitioner's Motion for Review of Pertinent Evidence Newly Acquired in the Above Numbered Cause [Doc. 65] is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

STEPHAN M. VIDMAR

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Rouse v. Romero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 6, 2013
No. 11-cv-0405 JCH/SMV (D.N.M. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Rouse v. Romero

Case Details

Full title:XEZAKIA ROUSE, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY ROMERO, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

No. 11-cv-0405 JCH/SMV (D.N.M. Mar. 6, 2013)