From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouse v. Klotz

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 1, 2013
CV 12-96 SVW (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2013)

Opinion


GARY ROUSE, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR KLOTZ, Defendant. No. CV 12-96 SVW (FFM) United States District Court, C.D. California. August 1, 2013

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.


Summaries of

Rouse v. Klotz

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 1, 2013
CV 12-96 SVW (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Rouse v. Klotz

Case Details

Full title:GARY ROUSE, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR KLOTZ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 1, 2013

Citations

CV 12-96 SVW (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2013)