From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouse v. II-VI Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 28, 2014
13cv0065 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 28, 2014)

Opinion

13cv0065

08-28-2014

AMBROSIO ROUSE, Plaintiff, v. II-VI INCORPORATED, ET AL., Defendants.


ELECTRONICALLY FILED

MEMORANDUM ORDER RE: PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S EXCEPTIONS TO ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN CASE (DOC. NO. 73)

Presently before this Court is a 38 page document filed by Pro Se Plaintiff entitled "Exceptions to Order dated July 31, 2014 Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Re-Open filed on July 18, 2014." Doc. No. 73. In this document, Plaintiff again moves this Court to modify its previous rulings. As this Court has set forth repeatedly, there are no grounds to disturb the order closing this case. See Doc. Nos. 50, 69, 72. Therefore, this 28th day of August, 2014, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT to the extent that Plaintiff's "Exceptions" is another motion to reconsider, said "Motion" (Doc. No. 73) is DENIED.

s/ Arthur J. Schwab

Arthur J. Schwab

United States District Judge
cc: All Registered ECF Counsel and Parties

AMBROSIO ROUSE

2770 St. Andrews Square

Apt #2117

Allison Park, PA 15101


Summaries of

Rouse v. II-VI Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 28, 2014
13cv0065 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 28, 2014)
Case details for

Rouse v. II-VI Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AMBROSIO ROUSE, Plaintiff, v. II-VI INCORPORATED, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 28, 2014

Citations

13cv0065 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 28, 2014)