From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rous v. Carlisle

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1943
50 N.E.2d 250 (N.Y. 1943)

Opinion

Argued April 8, 1943

Decided June 10, 1943

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, McCOOK, J.

Harry Bijur for appellants.

Horace R. Lamb and Homer Crawford for Edna R. Carlisle et al., as executors of Floyd L. Carlisle, deceased, and another, respondents.

Ralph M. Carson and Francis W. Phillips for George Whitney, respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, LEWIS and DESMOND, JJ. CONWAY, J., dissents upon the ground that a cause of action is stated in paragraphs 71 to 81 inclusive of the amended complaint. Taking no part: FINCH, J.


Summaries of

Rous v. Carlisle

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1943
50 N.E.2d 250 (N.Y. 1943)
Case details for

Rous v. Carlisle

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS ROUS et al., Appellants, v. EDNA R. CARLISLE et al., as Executors of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 10, 1943

Citations

50 N.E.2d 250 (N.Y. 1943)
50 N.E.2d 250

Citing Cases

Sorin v. Sharmoon

The court is of the opinion that sufficient facts have been alleged to require an answer by the defendants.…

Rosenfield v. Standard Electric Equipment Corp.

Orders reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motions to dismiss granted, with leave to plaintiff to…