From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rourke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 2, 2003
CASE NO. C01-01609 CRB ARB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2003)

Opinion

CASE NO. C01-01609 CRB ARB

October 2, 2003

STEPHEN P. ELLINGSON, HAYES, DAVIS, ELLINGSON, McLAY SCOTT LLP, Menlo Park, California for Defendant


STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER Fed. Rule Civ. Proc., Rule 41(a)(1)


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff DANIEL ROURXE through his attorney of record, Stephen H. Comet, and defendant STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY through its attorney of record Stephen P. Ellingson of Hayes, Davis, Ellingson, McLay Scott, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 41(a)(1).

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rourke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 2, 2003
CASE NO. C01-01609 CRB ARB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2003)
Case details for

Rourke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL ROURKE, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Oct 2, 2003

Citations

CASE NO. C01-01609 CRB ARB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2003)