From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rourke v. Francis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 17, 1948
274 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

November 17, 1948.


Appeal from an order to set aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff, Janet K. Rourke, in a negligence action, for inadequacy, and an order granting a new trial. The court was justified in setting aside the verdict for inadequacy. Order affirmed, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Appeal from an order in favor of Thomas W. Rourke, father of the infant, Janet K. Rourke, setting aside a verdict of $518 awarded him for medical expenses and loss of services. The jury brought in a verdict in accordance with the charge of the court and no exception was taken. Order granting a new trial reversed, on the law and facts, and the verdict of $518 in favor of the father, Thomas W. Rourke, and against the appellants, reinstated. Hill, P.J., Heffernan, Foster, Russell and Deyo, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rourke v. Francis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 17, 1948
274 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Rourke v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:JANET K. ROURKE, by THOMAS W. ROURKE, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1948

Citations

274 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)