From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ROUNDS v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2009
No. CIV S-09-0396 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-0396 FCD GGH P.

August 3, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner has requested reconsideration of the June 26, 2009, order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The court denied petitioner's application because it did not contain an affidavit claiming an entitlement to redress nor a statement of the issues he intended to appeal. Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(1).

In the request for reconsideration, petitioner states that his notice of appeal contains the information missing from his application to proceed in forma pauperis. Good cause appearing, the court takes judicial notice of petitioner's notice of appeal and finds that his application to proceed in forma pauperis satisfies the requirements of Rule 24(a)(1).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's July 6, 2009, motion for reconsideration (no. 18) is granted;

2. Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is granted.


Summaries of

ROUNDS v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2009
No. CIV S-09-0396 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2009)
Case details for

ROUNDS v. CATE

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE ROUNDS, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 3, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-0396 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2009)