From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roulhac v. Southwest Regional Transit Authority

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 31, 2008
Case Number: 1:07cv408 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2008)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:07cv408.

March 31, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Black. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on February 1, 2008 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21). Subsequently, the Plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) and Defendant Sorta filed a response in opposition to the objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendations should be adopted.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 5 and 14) are GRANTED and all pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. This case is hereby TERMINATED from the docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Roulhac v. Southwest Regional Transit Authority

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 31, 2008
Case Number: 1:07cv408 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Roulhac v. Southwest Regional Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE ROULHAC, Plaintiff(s), v. SOUTHWEST REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 31, 2008

Citations

Case Number: 1:07cv408 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2008)

Citing Cases

Yuan C. Yu v. Brennan

When subject matter jurisdiction is challenged, "the plaintiff has the burden of proving jurisdiction in…

WORLD HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS v. SSI SURGICAL SERVICES

See E.D.TN. LR 15.1. Plaintiff has not submitted a separate motion to amend nor a proposed amended complaint.…