From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roule v. Petraeus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 1, 2011
No. C 10-04632 CW (LB) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 10-04632 CW (LB) ECF No. 50

11-01-2011

WALTER R. ROULE, Plaintiff, v. DAVID PETRAEUS, Defendant.


ORDER & RECOMMENDATIONS RE DISCOVERY DEADLINES

In the above-captioned matter, the district court referred discovery, in addition to settlement, to the undersigned. Order, ECF No. 49 at 2. In its discovery referral, the district court authorized the undersigned to adjust any dates that do not affect the district court's hearing dates and to recommend changes in the district court's hearing and trial dates. Id.

The parties submitted a stipulation with the following proposed dates:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Event ¦Current Deadline ¦Proposed New Date ¦ +--------------------------------------+------------------+-------------------¦ ¦Case Management Conference ¦12/15/11 ¦5/17/12 ¦ +--------------------------------------+------------------+-------------------¦ ¦Close of Fact Discovery ¦10/3/11 ¦8/30/12 ¦ +--------------------------------------+------------------+-------------------¦ ¦Last Day to Disclose Experts ¦1/17/12 ¦9/30/12 ¦ +--------------------------------------+------------------+-------------------¦ ¦Last Day for Expert Discovery ¦2/17/12 ¦10/30/12 ¦ +--------------------------------------+------------------+-------------------¦ ¦Hearing Date for Case-Dispositive ¦12/15/11 ¦11/1/12 ¦ ¦Motions ¦ ¦ ¦ +--------------------------------------+------------------+-------------------¦ ¦Pretrial ¦4/10/12 ¦1/15/13 ¦ +--------------------------------------+------------------+-------------------¦ ¦Trial ¦4/23/12 ¦1/28/13 ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Joint Request, ECF No. 50 at 2.

Because these dates impact the district court's deadlines, the court does the following. As interim measure, the court ORDERS extends the discovery deadlines to December 1, 2011 to ensure that the parties continue to engage in the discovery process. The court further ORDERS the parties to contact courtroom deputy Lashanda Scott at 1-510-637-3525 to schedule a telephonic conference with counsel to address outstanding discovery management issues. Additionally, given the sensitivity of the information at issue in this case and the attendant discovery delays, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the district court adopt the parties' proposed schedule.

IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS SO RECOMMENDED

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Roule v. Petraeus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 1, 2011
No. C 10-04632 CW (LB) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Roule v. Petraeus

Case Details

Full title:WALTER R. ROULE, Plaintiff, v. DAVID PETRAEUS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 1, 2011

Citations

No. C 10-04632 CW (LB) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2011)