From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roul v. George

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 28, 2014
Case No.: 2:13-cv-01686-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 28, 2014)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:13-cv-01686-GMN-CWH

03-28-2014

ERIC ROUL, individually and as Trustee of the ERIC ROUL TRUST, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE C. GEORGE, et al., Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT &

RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE

JUDGE HOFFMAN

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 54) of the Honorable C.W. Hoffman, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, entered March 10, 2014.

Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by March 27, 2014. No objections have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4, the Court has reviewed the record in this case and agrees with Magistrate Judge Hoffman's recommendation that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 45) be Granted. Therefore, the Court has determined that Magistrate Judge Hoffman's Recommendation should be ACCEPTED and ADOPTED to the extent that it is not inconsistent with this opinion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 54) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that default judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant George C. George in the amount of $3,440,000.00, plus pre-judgment interest with post-judgment interest accruing until the judgment is paid as indicated above.

__________

Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Roul v. George

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 28, 2014
Case No.: 2:13-cv-01686-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 28, 2014)
Case details for

Roul v. George

Case Details

Full title:ERIC ROUL, individually and as Trustee of the ERIC ROUL TRUST, Plaintiff…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 28, 2014

Citations

Case No.: 2:13-cv-01686-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 28, 2014)

Citing Cases

Finite Mgmt. v. OtoPilot LLC

By moving for default judgment on the fraudulent inducement claim against Defaulted Defendants, Plaintiffs…