From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rottinger v. Cryo-Dyne Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 17, 1995
214 A.D.2d 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 17, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The injured plaintiff allegedly aggravated a pre-existing back injury when he attempted to move a certain nitrogen canister during the course of his employment. We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendant and the third-party defendant Minnesota Valley Engineering, Inc., made prima facie showings that the injured plaintiff's injuries were not causally related to the accident in question and that the canister was not defective. We further agree that the plaintiff failed to meet his burden of demonstrating a material issue of fact which requires trial. Summary judgment was thus properly awarded (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rottinger v. Cryo-Dyne Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 17, 1995
214 A.D.2d 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Rottinger v. Cryo-Dyne Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ROTTINGER et al., Appellants, v. CRYO-DYNE CORP., Defendant and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 17, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 288