From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rottenberg v. Clarke

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 18, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1628 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-18-2016

In the Matter of Eta ROTTENBERG, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Wayne CLARKE, Respondent–Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.).

Wayne Clarke, Respondent–Appellant Pro Se. Sheila Sullivan Dickinson, Attorney for the Child, Middlesex.


Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Kevin M. Carter, J.), entered March 13, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order restrained respondent from injurious actions with respect to the subject child.

Wayne Clarke, Respondent–Appellant Pro Se.

Sheila Sullivan Dickinson, Attorney for the Child, Middlesex.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Rottenberg v. Clarke (Appeal No. 1), ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2016 WL 6816495 (Nov. 18, 2016).

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, DeJOSEPH, and SCUDDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rottenberg v. Clarke

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 18, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1628 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Rottenberg v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Eta ROTTENBERG, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Wayne CLARKE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 18, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 1628 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7771
40 N.Y.S.3d 809