Rotroff v. Robinson

Full title: DENIS K. ROTROFF, Plaintiff, v. JIM ROBINSON, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 31, 2011

1:06-CV-01419-LJO-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2011)

Opinion

DENIS K. ROTROFF, Plaintiff, v. JIM ROBINSON, et al., Defendants. No. 1:06-CV-01419-LJO-DLB PC United States District Court, E.D. California. January 31, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. 62)

          LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

         Plaintiff Denis K. Rotroff ("Plaintiff") is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On December 3, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within twenty days. Neither party filed a timely Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

         In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 3, 2010, is adopted in full; and

         2. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, filed October 22, 2010, is DENIED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.