From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rotroff v. Robinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 1, 2008
1:06-cv-01419-LJO-DLB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2008)

Opinion

1:06-cv-01419-LJO-DLB (PC).

May 1, 2008


ORDER GRANTING FIRST MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION (DOCUMENT #29) THIRTY DAY DEADLINE


Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 28, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to file a reply to the response in opposition to motion. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order in which to file a reply to response in opposition to motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rotroff v. Robinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 1, 2008
1:06-cv-01419-LJO-DLB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2008)
Case details for

Rotroff v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:DENIS K. ROTROFF, Plaintiff, v. JIM ROBINSON, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 1, 2008

Citations

1:06-cv-01419-LJO-DLB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2008)