From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rothwell v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 21, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0844 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-0844 DAD P.

April 21, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of coram nobis. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.

DATED: April 20, 2011.


Summaries of

Rothwell v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 21, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0844 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Rothwell v. People

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ROTHWELL, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 21, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-0844 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2011)