From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rothschild v. Pfizer Corp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jun 24, 2024
2:24-cv-301-SPC-KCD (M.D. Fla. Jun. 24, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-301-SPC-KCD

06-24-2024

MAYER AMSCHEL ROTHSCHILD, and to all others similarly situated class action, Plaintiff, v. PFIZER CORPORATION, EALON JOELSON and PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION, Defendants.


ORDER

KYLE C. DUDEK, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, proceeding without a lawyer, filed what the Court construes as a motion for extension of time to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 12.) The Court grants the request, but notes that this is Plaintiff's second request for an extension of time. See Doc. 8. No further extensions will be granted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 12) is GRANTED. Plaintiff must file an amended complaint that complies with the Court's prior Order (Doc. 4) by July 18, 2024. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed.

2. Plaintiff's duplicate motion for extension (Doc. 10) is DENIED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

Rothschild v. Pfizer Corp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jun 24, 2024
2:24-cv-301-SPC-KCD (M.D. Fla. Jun. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Rothschild v. Pfizer Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MAYER AMSCHEL ROTHSCHILD, and to all others similarly situated class…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jun 24, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-301-SPC-KCD (M.D. Fla. Jun. 24, 2024)