From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rothman v. Strang, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 25, 1934
152 Misc. 606 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)

Opinion

May 25, 1934.

Appeal from the City Court of New York, New York County.

Esquirol Esquirol, for the appellant.

Michael Gold, for the respondent.


Rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice may not be invoked in an action for conversion. Moreover, triable issues of fact are presented by the affidavits.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

All concur; present, CALLAHAN, FRANKENTHALER and SHIENTAG, JJ.


Summaries of

Rothman v. Strang, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 25, 1934
152 Misc. 606 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
Case details for

Rothman v. Strang, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ROTHMAN, Respondent, v. CHARLES D. STRANG, INC., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 25, 1934

Citations

152 Misc. 606 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
273 N.Y.S. 816

Citing Cases

Messina v. Turrito

The court denied defendant's motion but granted plaintiff's motion, struck out defendant's answer and ordered…