From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rothman v. Rosenberg

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 25, 1958
152 N.E.2d 521 (N.Y. 1958)

Opinion

Argued May 14, 1958

Decided June 25, 1958

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, SAMUEL C. COLEMAN, J.

Emile Z. Berman and Howard Lester for appellants.

Jacob D. Fuchsberg, Abraham Fuchsberg and B. Hoffman Miller for Dotty Karpel, respondent.

Harold M. Hoffman, Abraham Fuchsberg and B. Hoffman Miller for Simon Schwartzberg, respondent. Abraham Umanov, Samuel J. Moskowitz and Milton Jacobs for Lilie Gritz and another, respondents.

Barnet S. Blume and Benjamin H. Siff for Ethel Rosenberg, respondent.

Harold Kornfeld for Louis Rothman, respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and BURKE. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the complaints upon the ground that the physical facts and circumstances of the accident render its occurrence in the manner claimed by the plaintiffs incredible as a matter of law.


Summaries of

Rothman v. Rosenberg

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 25, 1958
152 N.E.2d 521 (N.Y. 1958)
Case details for

Rothman v. Rosenberg

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS ROTHMAN et al., Respondents, et al., Plaintiff, v. Estate of DAVID…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 25, 1958

Citations

152 N.E.2d 521 (N.Y. 1958)
152 N.E.2d 521
177 N.Y.S.2d 495

Citing Cases

Zaninovich v. American Airlines

The court has carefully examined defendant's memoranda, pointing out claimed errors in the reception of…

Lucivero v. Long Island R.R. Co.

Taking all of the above factors into consideration, and recognizing "that there is no mathematical formula…