From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rothenberg v. Willis

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 25, 1986
483 So. 2d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-2238.

February 25, 1986.

Appeal from a non-final order of the Circuit Court for Dade County; Donald E. Stone, Judge.

Stephens, Lynn, Chernay Klein, P.A., and Debra J. Snow, Caron E. Speas, and Robert M. Klein, Miami, for appellants.

Rubin Baum Levin Constant Friedman Bilzin and David W. Trench, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.


Affirmed.


I respectfully dissent.

The trial court should not have denied the appellants' motion to compel arbitration as to three counts of the complaint without first hearing evidence on the issue of whether the subject matter of the three counts falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc. v. Falowski, 425 So.2d 129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (1983).

I would reverse for an evidentiary hearing on all the counts.


Summaries of

Rothenberg v. Willis

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 25, 1986
483 So. 2d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Rothenberg v. Willis

Case Details

Full title:BARRETT ROTHENBERG, LARRY ROTHENBERG, LAWRENCE SAICHEK, AND ROTHENBERG…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 25, 1986

Citations

483 So. 2d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)