From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rothenberg v. Radtke Bros., Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 9, 1941
310 Ill. App. 538 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,628. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed June 9, 1941

GARNISHMENT, § 10principal debtor, as not person to whom garnishee indebted. Garnishee was properly dismissed, where it appeared that judgment debtor was a corporation, but in a certain business transaction garnishee dealt with an individual who had formerly been associated with the corporation but who was conducting a business individually, garnishee took a guaranty against adulterating or misbranding goods involved from the individual and not the corporation, and although use by the individual of old corporation stationery was not commended because of its tendency to confuse, there was no question of an estoppel.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Municipal Court of Chicago; Hon. MASON S. SULLIVAN, presiding.

Heard in first division, first district, this court at April term, 1941.

I.J. Berkson and Mayer Goldberg, for appellant;

Charles T. Shanner, for appellees.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed June 9, 1941.


Summaries of

Rothenberg v. Radtke Bros., Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 9, 1941
310 Ill. App. 538 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)
Case details for

Rothenberg v. Radtke Bros., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Herman Rothenberg, Appellant, v. Radtke Bros., Inc., Appellee. Armour and…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jun 9, 1941

Citations

310 Ill. App. 538 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)
34 N.E.2d 892

Citing Cases

State v. Woods

(B) Where the defendant's conduct constitutes two or more offenses of dissimilar import, or where his conduct…

State v. Wolfe

{¶30} In State v. Ruff, 143 Ohio St.3d 114, 2015-Ohio-995, 34 N.E.2d 892, the Ohio Supreme Court revised its…