From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roth v. Turoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 1986
124 A.D.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Roth, Supreme Court addressed whether New York City Council could require an attorney to obtain a license to act, not as a taxi driver, but as a taxi broker.

Summary of this case from Eric M. Berman, P.C. v. City of N.Y.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

November 6, 1986

Order and judgment (one paper), of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Herbert Shapiro, J.), entered on May 30, 1985, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Herbert Shapiro, J., at Special Term, without costs and without disbursements.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Carro, Asch and Rosenberger, JJ.

Summaries of

Roth v. Turoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 1986
124 A.D.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

In Roth, Supreme Court addressed whether New York City Council could require an attorney to obtain a license to act, not as a taxi driver, but as a taxi broker.

Summary of this case from Eric M. Berman, P.C. v. City of N.Y.
Case details for

Roth v. Turoff

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL H. ROTH, Respondent, v. JAY TUROFF, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1986

Citations

124 A.D.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Eric M. Berman, P.C. v. City of N.Y.

As the New York courts have recognized, the language of § 90 establishing that “[t]he supreme court shall…

1 Citing Cases