From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roth Grading, Inc. v. H.M. Miller Constr. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Jul 20, 2012
CASE NO. 8:11CV242 (D. Neb. Jul. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:11CV242

07-20-2012

ROTH GRADING, INC., d/b/a IMPACT ROLLER TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiff, v. H.M. MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO., Defendant.


ORDER

Before the Court is the Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 59), and the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Index of Evidence in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 62). Both Motions are opposed. (See Filing No. 60 (opposition to Defendant's Motion); Filing No. 63 (opposition to Plaintiff's Motion).) Having considered the matters, the Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply will be denied, and the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Index of Evidence will be granted. Accordingly,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

1. The Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 59) is denied;
2. The Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Index of Evidence in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 62) is granted; and
3. The Plaintiff shall submit its supplemental index of evidence on or before July 25, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Laurie Smith Camp

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Roth Grading, Inc. v. H.M. Miller Constr. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Jul 20, 2012
CASE NO. 8:11CV242 (D. Neb. Jul. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Roth Grading, Inc. v. H.M. Miller Constr. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROTH GRADING, INC., d/b/a IMPACT ROLLER TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiff, v. H.M…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: Jul 20, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 8:11CV242 (D. Neb. Jul. 20, 2012)

Citing Cases

Thommen v. Aldine Trust Co.

The primary rule in the construction of contracts is that the court must, if possible, ascertain and give…

Whalen et al. v. Smith Fireproof Const. Co.

From the provisions of the contract respecting the hoist and cable and defendant's supervision of the work,…