From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roten v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Oct 2, 2018
No. 356, 2018 (Del. Oct. 2, 2018)

Opinion

No. 356, 2018

10-02-2018

BEN ROTEN, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.


Court Below—Superior Court of the State of Delaware ID. No. 0401005180 (S) Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices. ORDER

After careful consideration of the appellant's opening brief, the appellee's motion to affirm, and the record below, we conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's well-reasoned order, dated June 26, 2018, denying the appellant's fourth motion for postconviction relief. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that the motion was procedurally barred and did not satisfy the pleading requirements of Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(d)(2).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice


Summaries of

Roten v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Oct 2, 2018
No. 356, 2018 (Del. Oct. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Roten v. State

Case Details

Full title:BEN ROTEN, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Oct 2, 2018

Citations

No. 356, 2018 (Del. Oct. 2, 2018)