From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rote v. George St. Peter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 2, 1985
111 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

May 2, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Montgomery County (Mercure, J.).


Plaintiff commenced the instant action in September 1982 to recover damages for personal injuries she allegedly sustained as a result of an automobile accident which occurred on October 27, 1981. In a bill of particulars, plaintiff acknowledged that she did not suffer a permanent injury; however, she contended that the injuries to her knee constituted: "a medically determined injury or impairment of a non-permanent nature which prevented her from performing substantially all of the material acts which constituted her usual and customary daily activities for not less than ninety days during the one hundred and eighty days immediately following the occurrence of the injury". ( See, Insurance Law § 5102 [d].) At an examination before trial, plaintiff explained that the only medical attention she received was rendered on visits to a hospital emergency room on the date of the accident, October 27, 1981, and shortly thereafter, on November 2, 1981. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was a student. Plaintiff stated that due to her injuries, she was forced to miss about a week of school and gym class for approximately 45 days. Plaintiff further stated that the only thing she was unable to do after January 1, 1982 was take her customary long walks.

Defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as defined in Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Special Term granted the motion and the instant appeal ensued.

An examination of the record supports Special Term's determination. Plaintiff's own testimony at the examination before trial belies her claim of serious injury. Moreover, plaintiff has failed to present medical evidence to substantiate her claim of serious injury ( see, Daviero v. Johnson, 88 A.D.2d 732, 733; Hezekiah v. Williams, 81 A.D.2d 261). Accordingly, the order must be affirmed ( see, Jones v. Sharpe, 99 A.D.2d 859, affd 63 N.Y.2d 645).

Order affirmed, with costs. Kane, J.P., Casey, Mikoll, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rote v. George St. Peter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 2, 1985
111 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Rote v. George St. Peter

Case Details

Full title:JEANETTE ROTE, Appellant, v. GEORGE ST. PETER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 2, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

ROTE v. ST. PETER

Decided November 14, 1985 Appeal from (3d dept: 111 A.D.2d 437) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO…

Osowicki v. Young

Supreme Court was required to make a threshold determination in this action of whether plaintiff established…