From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rostano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 11, 2006
917 So. 2d 422 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 4D04-59.

January 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Peter M. Weinstein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 92-547CF10A.

Kayo E. Morgan of Kayo E. Morgan, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and August A. Bonavita, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the orders denying post conviction relief. We write to briefly address the claim that counsel was deficient for failing to request a "good faith belief" jury instruction. During appellant's trial, this issue was adequately covered by counsel's argument and the standard jury instruction on grand theft, which required proof of criminal intent. Accordingly, "counsel's failure to proffer a specific instruction on good faith did not fall outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance." Willis v. U.S., 87 F.3d 1004, 1008 (8th Cir. 1996) (internal citations omitted). Also, we find no prejudice in the failure to request the instruction because there was not a reasonable probability that the jury would have decided the case differently had the instruction been given. See U.S. v. Haddock, 12 F.3d 950, 959 (10th Cir. 1993).

FARMER, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rostano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 11, 2006
917 So. 2d 422 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Rostano v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony ROSTANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 11, 2006

Citations

917 So. 2d 422 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)