Rossi v. City of Trenton

Full title: KENDALL ROSSI, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TRENTON, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jan 31, 2023

Civil Action 18-12708 (ZNQ) (LHG) (D.N.J. Jan. 31, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 18-12708 (ZNQ) (LHG)

01-31-2023

KENDALL ROSSI, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TRENTON, et al., Defendants.

ZAHID N. QURAISHI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

ZAHID N. QURAISHI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants City of Trenton, The Trenton Police Department, Ernest Parrey, Jr., Detective Jorge Mejia, Detective Jonathan P. Cincilla, and Detective Jeffrey Donaire, (collectively, “Defendants”) pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 42.) For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion and other good cause shown, IT IS on this 31st day of January 2023, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 42) is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

• Summary Judgment is GRANTED on Counts One and Four as to Defendant Trenton Police Department. JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Defendant Trenton Police Department;

• Summary Judgment is DENIED on Counts One and Four as to Defendants Ernest Parrey Jr., Detective Jorge Mejia, Detective Jonathan P. Cincilla, Detective Jeffrey Donaire, and Defendant City of Trenton;

• Summary Judgment on Counts Two and Three is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Counts Two and Three of the Complaint are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.