From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Varano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 16, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-0838 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-0838

03-16-2012

TIMOTHY ROSS, Petitioner v. DAVID VARANO, et al., Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 16day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 32), filed January 31, 2012, to which no objections were filed, and upon independent review of the record, it is ordered that:

1. The magistrate judge's report (Doc. 32) is adopted.
2. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED.
3. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania shall reinstate Petitioner's direct appeal nunc pro tunc within ninety (90) days of the date of this order.

_______________

William W. Caldwell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ross v. Varano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 16, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-0838 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Ross v. Varano

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY ROSS, Petitioner v. DAVID VARANO, et al., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 16, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-0838 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2012)