From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Tortorice

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
1:20-cv-01000-BAK (BAM) (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01000-BAK (BAM) (PC)

06-24-2022

DAVID ROSS, Plaintiff, v. S. TORTORICE, Defendant.


ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

(Doc. 33)

BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff David Ross is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. (See Doc. 28 [Consent Minute Order].)

On June 23, 2022, counsel for Defendant Tortorice filed a Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice. (Doc. No. 33.) It states the parties “have resolved this case in its entirety” and that each party shall bear its own costs and fees. (Id. at 1.) The stipulation is signed and dated by Plaintiff David Ross and Christian M. Georgely, counsel for Defendant Tortorice. (Id. at 2.) 1

Accordingly, this action is terminated by operation of law without further order from the Court. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and deadlines and to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 2


Summaries of

Ross v. Tortorice

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
1:20-cv-01000-BAK (BAM) (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Ross v. Tortorice

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ROSS, Plaintiff, v. S. TORTORICE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 24, 2022

Citations

1:20-cv-01000-BAK (BAM) (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)