From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ROSS v. TOMLAB OPTIMIZATION AB

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 23, 2009
No. C-08-1052 MHP (N.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2009)

Opinion

No. C-08-1052 MHP.

February 23, 2009


ORDER (Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal)


The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.


Summaries of

ROSS v. TOMLAB OPTIMIZATION AB

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 23, 2009
No. C-08-1052 MHP (N.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2009)
Case details for

ROSS v. TOMLAB OPTIMIZATION AB

Case Details

Full title:I. MICHAEL ROSS, Plaintiff(s), v. TOMLAB OPTIMIZATION AB et al…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 23, 2009

Citations

No. C-08-1052 MHP (N.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2009)