From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 30, 2014
160 So. 3d 897 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC14–2019.

12-30-2014

Lasedrick M. ROSS, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Opinion

The petition to invoke all writs jurisdiction is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the petitioner has failed to cite an independent basis that would allow the Court to exercise its all writs authority and no such basis is apparent on the face of the petition. See Williams v. State, 913 So.2d 541, 543–44 (Fla.2005) ; St. Paul Title Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 392 So.2d 1304, 1305 (Fla.1980). Petitioner's “Petition to Amend and Clarify Point Three of Issue One” is hereby denied. No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by this Court.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ross v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 30, 2014
160 So. 3d 897 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Ross v. State

Case Details

Full title:Lasedrick M. ROSS, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Dec 30, 2014

Citations

160 So. 3d 897 (Fla. 2014)