Ross v. State

Full title: ROSS et al. v. THE STATE

Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 19, 1983

308 S.E.2d 713 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)

168 Ga. App. 51

Opinion

66982.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 19, 1983.

Robbery. Tift Superior Court. Before Judge Crosby.

Thomas H. Pittman, District Attorney, for appellee.

SOGNIER, Judge.

Appellants were convicted of robbery by sudden snatching. Their attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 ( 87 SC 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered could arguably support an appeal. We are in agreement with counsel that none of the points raised, though persuasively presented, has any merit. Therefore, we granted the motion to withdraw. In addition, we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We have found none. We are satisfied that the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to authorize any rational trier of fact to find appellants guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 ( 264 S.E.2d 528).

Judgment affirmed. Quillian, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 19, 1983.