Ross v. State

2 Citing cases

  1. Gray v. State

    169 So. 3d 982 (Miss. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 1 times

    In this case, the record reflects sufficient evidence exists from which the jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt the essential elements of the charged offense of grand larceny, including the value of the stolen boat and trailer at $1,000 or more. See Ross v. State, 914 So.2d 814, 815 (¶ 8) (Miss.Ct.App.2005). As a result, we affirm Gray's conviction and sentence.

  2. Nelson v. State

    32 So. 3d 534 (Miss. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 2 times

    Nelson claims that only Turner presented the checks to be cashed. Although Nelson did not physically cash the checks, he is guilty of uttering a forgery as a principal because he acted in concert with Turner. Ross v. State, 914 So.2d 814, 816 (¶ 11) (Miss.Ct.App. 2005). Turner, who was an admitted drug user, testified that Nelson sought his help in cashing some checks.