From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 27, 1996
916 S.W.2d 872 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 68314.

February 27, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS; KENNETH M. WEINSTOCK, JUDGE.

David Simpson, Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Christine M. Blegen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.


A jury found defendant guilty of distribution of a controlled substance near a school, § 195.214, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him as a prior offender to twenty years imprisonment. On appeal, this court affirmed. State v. Ross, 877 S.W.2d 197 (Mo.App.E.D. 1994).

Defendant now appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The motion court's judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16 (b).


Summaries of

Ross v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 27, 1996
916 S.W.2d 872 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Ross v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARCHIE ROSS, DEFENDANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Feb 27, 1996

Citations

916 S.W.2d 872 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)