Opinion
WD 82318
01-28-2020
Eddie ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Susan A. DeGeorge, St. Louis, for appellant. Karen L. Kamer, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Susan A. DeGeorge, St. Louis, for appellant.
Karen L. Kamer, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, Presiding, Lisa White Hardwick and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges
ORDER
Per Curiam Eddie Ross appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of first-degree robbery and the conviction was affirmed on appeal. Ross contends he was entitled to post-conviction relief because his appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to raise a claim of error regarding the admission of evidence related to a high-speed car chase that occurred after the robbery. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).