From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Silverman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Oct 1, 1898
24 Misc. 762 (N.Y. App. Term 1898)

Opinion

October, 1898.

J.L. Weinberg, for appellant.

Ryan Richards, for respondent.


There is no evidence tending to show that the plaintiff had any authority from the defendant to pay the premiums of insurance for him to recover which this action is brought. The judgment must, therefore, be reversed.

Present: BEEKMAN, P.J., GILDERSLEEVE and GIEGERICH, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

Ross v. Silverman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Oct 1, 1898
24 Misc. 762 (N.Y. App. Term 1898)
Case details for

Ross v. Silverman

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS H. ROSS, Respondent, v . ISREAL SILVERMAN, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Oct 1, 1898

Citations

24 Misc. 762 (N.Y. App. Term 1898)