Ross v. Sejin Am., Inc.

1 Citing case

  1. Terry v. Robinett

    2:20-cv-01058-RAH-SRW (M.D. Ala. Aug. 23, 2021)   Cited 1 times

    Given the deficiencies in the pro se Plaintiff's complaint, the court concludes that, based upon the District Court's inherent authority to manage its docket, the appropriate remedy for this shotgun pleading is to dismiss all of Plaintiff's claims without prejudice and to allow Plaintiff to replead her claims, especially where (as here) Plaintiff has requested the opportunity to do so. Ross v. Sejin Am., Inc., No. 3:18-CV-537, 2019 WL 404174, at *3 (M.D. Ala. Jan. 31, 2019); Conner v. Marriott Hotel Servs., Inc., No. 220CV840FTM38NPM, 2020 WL 6873374, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 23, 2020). Plaintiff is cautioned that if she chooses to file an amended complaint, she must do the following to avoid dismissal: (1) address the shortcomings of her first complaint noted in this report and recommendation; (2) provide a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction; (3) comply with the pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 8 by setting forth, with clarity, short and plain statements showing that she is entitled to relief,