From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Santa Barbara News Press

Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Three.
Oct 24, 2003
B151127 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2003)

Opinion

B151127.

10-24-2003

LEONARD M. ROSS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SANTA BARBARA NEWS PRESS, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants.


ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

THE COURT:

Good cause appearing, the opinion in the above entitled matter, filed on September 26, 2003, Not for Publication, is hereby modified as follows:

(a) On page 16, first sentence of the third full paragraph, beginning "In Dombey, the issue" is modified to read as follows:

In Dombey, the issue as to whether the plaintiff in a defamation lawsuit was a public figure was raised sua sponte by the Arizona Supreme Court.

(b) On page 32, line 22, first sentence beginning "Negligence, extreme negligence," is modified to read as follows:

Neither negligence, extreme negligence, choice of language, editorial decisions, unknowingly misleading the public, investigative failures, nor lack of objectivity, by themselves, are sufficient to prove actual malice.

The petition for rehearing filed by plaintiff and appellant Leonard M. Ross is denied.

There is no change in the judgment.


Summaries of

Ross v. Santa Barbara News Press

Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Three.
Oct 24, 2003
B151127 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2003)
Case details for

Ross v. Santa Barbara News Press

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD M. ROSS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SANTA BARBARA NEWS PRESS…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Three.

Date published: Oct 24, 2003

Citations

B151127 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2003)