From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Ross

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 23, 1982
55 N.Y.2d 999 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided February 23, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, WILLIAM G. GIACCIO, J.

Joel Sankel and Claudio B. Bergamasco for appellants-respondents.

Alexander Potruch, Kenneth Koopersmith and Michael K. Feigenbaum for respondent-appellant.



On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]): Plaintiff's cross appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the cross appeal pursuant to CPLR 5601 (subd [d]) does not lie because the cross appellant is not a party aggrieved by the prior nonfinal order of the Appellate Division (CPLR 5511). Defendants' appeal pursuant to CPLR 5601 (subd [a], par [ii]) dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and a separate appeal does not lie (see Matter of Aho [ Rhodes], 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). On defendants' appeal, pursuant to CPLR 5601 (subd [d]), from the judgment of separation entered in Supreme Court, Queens County, judgment affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Ross v. Ross

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 23, 1982
55 N.Y.2d 999 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Ross v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:TAMAR ROSS, Respondent-Appellant, v. HOWARD ROSS et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 23, 1982

Citations

55 N.Y.2d 999 (N.Y. 1982)
449 N.Y.S.2d 481
434 N.E.2d 717

Citing Cases

Zuckerman v. Zuckerman

Defendant may not claim prejudice by virtue of the fact that the granting of a discontinuance will deprive…

Ullo v. Ullo

The statute provides that the absence of a cross motion does not preclude entry of a judgment in favor of the…