From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 8, 1990
75 N.Y.2d 825 (N.Y. 1990)

Opinion

Decided February 8, 1990

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Andrew Tyler, J.

Frank A. Weg for appellant.

Michael A. Ellenberg for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 150 A.D.2d 187). To the extent that appellant has preserved his argument for our review, we add only that preclusive effect may be given to issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided (compare, Malloy v Trombley, 50 N.Y.2d 46, 50-53, with O'Connor v G R Packing Co., 53 N.Y.2d 278, 282-284).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

Ross v. Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 8, 1990
75 N.Y.2d 825 (N.Y. 1990)
Case details for

Ross v. Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY ROSS, Appellant, v. MEDICAL LIABILITY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 8, 1990

Citations

75 N.Y.2d 825 (N.Y. 1990)
552 N.Y.S.2d 559
551 N.E.2d 1237

Citing Cases

Zayatz v. Collins

A party seeking to invoke the doctrine of collateral estoppel "must prove, [inter alia], that the identical…

Woods v. State

The doctrine of "[c]ollateral estoppel bars relitigation of an issue 'which has necessarily been decided in…