From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Lane Cmty. Coll.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 6, 2015
Case No. 6:15 CV 1900-TC (D. Or. Nov. 6, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 6:15 CV 1900-TC

11-06-2015

JAMES E. ROSS, Plaintiff, v. LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on October 14, 2015. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 6 day of November, 2015.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ross v. Lane Cmty. Coll.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 6, 2015
Case No. 6:15 CV 1900-TC (D. Or. Nov. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Ross v. Lane Cmty. Coll.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. ROSS, Plaintiff, v. LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Nov 6, 2015

Citations

Case No. 6:15 CV 1900-TC (D. Or. Nov. 6, 2015)