From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Jeansonne

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-188-FJP-DLD (M.D. La. Jun. 14, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-188-FJP-DLD

06-14-2012

JAMES E. ROSS AND VIVIAN ROSS v. JONATHAN JEANSONNE AND STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY


OPINION

After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report to which no objection was filed:

Rec. Doc. No. 9.

The Court finds that plaintiffs' motion to remand should be granted in part and denied in part. The motion for remand is granted in that this matter is remanded back to the 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana. The portion of the motion which requests attorney's fees and costs is denied.

Rec. Doc. No. 4.
--------

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, June 14, 2012.

______________________

FRANK J. POLOZOLA

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Ross v. Jeansonne

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-188-FJP-DLD (M.D. La. Jun. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Ross v. Jeansonne

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. ROSS AND VIVIAN ROSS v. JONATHAN JEANSONNE AND STATE FARM…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jun 14, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-188-FJP-DLD (M.D. La. Jun. 14, 2012)