From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Harrell

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 21, 2022
22-CV-1193 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-1193 (LTS)

03-21-2022

DARNELL ROSS; JEWEL; SHARON JENNIFER; JAMES; JULIAN; JOSH JAMAR; SHAOLIA. MAYA; JOE HAYES, Plaintiffs, v. BRUCE HARRELL, MAYOR; UNION PACIFIC RAIL LINE, OWNER; JAY INSLEE, GOVERNOR; LINOLA. RIDGE ADMINISTRATOR, SEATTLE WA; JAY Z; RAPPER; LIL BOOSIE, RAPPER; LIL WAYNE, RAPPER, Defendants.


CIVIL JUDGMENT

LAURA. TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge.

Pursuant to the order issued March 21, 2022, dismissing the complaint, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ross v. Harrell

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 21, 2022
22-CV-1193 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Ross v. Harrell

Case Details

Full title:DARNELL ROSS; JEWEL; SHARON JENNIFER; JAMES; JULIAN; JOSH JAMAR; SHAOLIA…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 21, 2022

Citations

22-CV-1193 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2022)