From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Goddard

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 9, 2006
No. CV-04-1198-PHX-DGC (DKD) (D. Ariz. Jun. 9, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV-04-1198-PHX-DGC (DKD).

June 9, 2006


ORDER


Pending before the Court are Petitioner Michael Andre Ross' petition for writ of habeas corpus and United States Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan's Report and Recommendation ("RR"). Docs. ##1, 18. The RR recommends that the Court deny the petition. Doc. #18 at 7. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had ten days to file objections to the RR and that the failure to timely file objections to any determination of the Magistrate Judge would be considered a waiver of the right to review of such determination. Id. at 7 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).

Following issuance of the RR, Petitioner filed a Motion to Supplement. Doc. #20. The motion contained Petitioner's present address at a prison in Buckeye, Arizona. The Court's docket shows that the RR was returned to the Court as undeliverable. Doc. #19. It appears that Petitioner did not keep the Court advised of his change of address.

Although the Court has no duty to locate Petitioners who fail inform the Court of changes in address, in this case the Petitioner's Motion to Supplement provides his current address. The Court accordingly will direct the Clerk to mail a copy of the RR to Petitioner along with a copy of this Order. The warning contained on page 7 of the RR shall apply from the date of service of the RR and this Order. The Court will also refer the Motion to Supplement to Magistrate Judge Duncan for consideration.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Magistrate Judge Duncan's RR (Doc. #18) and this Order shall be mailed to Petitioner at the address shown on his Motion to Supplement (Doc. # 20).

2. The warning contained on page 7 of the RR shall apply from the date of service of the RR and this Order on Petitioner at the address shown on Doc. #20.

3. Petitioner's Motion to Supplement (Doc. #20) shall be referred to the Magistrate Judge for consideration.


Summaries of

Ross v. Goddard

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 9, 2006
No. CV-04-1198-PHX-DGC (DKD) (D. Ariz. Jun. 9, 2006)
Case details for

Ross v. Goddard

Case Details

Full title:Michael Andre Ross, Petitioner, v. Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jun 9, 2006

Citations

No. CV-04-1198-PHX-DGC (DKD) (D. Ariz. Jun. 9, 2006)